🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.2/5 from 369+ reviews
Women βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller 

FLOWING - Trousers - bordeaux

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.2 out of 5 (369 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$59.95
$99.92
Sale
βœ“ on the house dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Rise : NormalPockets : Side pocketsPattern : StripedDetails : Elasticated waistArticle number : M3I21A1B9-G11

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
express fulfillment
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

FLOWING - Trousers - bordeaux

Rise : Normal
Pockets : Side pockets
Pattern : Striped
Details : Elasticated waist
Article number : M3I21A1B9-G11

This product is impeccable for anyone looking for quality Women products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1230029

Category: Women > Clothing > Trousers

Original Price: $99.92 USD

Sale Price:$59.95 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

🚚 dispatch & Returns

βœ“ on the house delivery on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days​

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.2
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 369 reviews
DC
Daniel Clark βœ“ Verified
1 month ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
outstanding for FLOWING - Trousers - bordeaux
At first, the FLOWING - Trousers - bordeaux is straightforward to use which feels reasonable. Works fine so far.
EY
Elizabeth Young βœ“ Verified
6 days ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
magnificent FLOWING - Trousers - bordeaux!
So far, the FLOWING - Trousers - bordeaux works fine so it’s acceptable.
BW
Brandon Wright βœ“ Verified
2 months ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
extraordinary Quality
Personally, the FLOWING - Trousers - bordeaux is practical and it meets expectations.
TT
Thomas Taylor βœ“ Verified
2 weeks ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
superb Value for Money
At first, the FLOWING - Trousers - bordeaux is straightforward to use and it meets expectations.
MW
Michelle Walker βœ“ Verified
1 month ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
superb FLOWING - Trousers - bordeaux!
At first, it works well enough which is good enough.