🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.1/5 from 404+ reviews
Women βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller 

Turquoise Bangle

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.1 out of 5 (404 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$100
$166.67
Sale
βœ“ on the house dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

I am selling this turquoise bangle! The stone is cracked and chipped as you can see in the photos (hence the lowered price) but it is still. truly pretty. If you have any questions please contact me

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift dispatch
↩️
practical Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Turquoise Bangle

I am selling this turquoise bangle! The stone is cracked and chipped as you can see in the photos (hence the lowered price) but it is still. truly pretty. If you have any questions please contact me

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Women products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 2539686

Category: Women > Jewelry > Rings

Original Price: $166.67 USD

Sale Price:$100 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

βœ“ on the house dispatch on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days​

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.1
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 404 reviews
KC
Kayla Campbell βœ“ Verified
4 weeks ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Five Stars for Turquoise Bangle
Honestly, the Turquoise Bangle is uncomplicated to use and it meets expectations.
SA
Samantha Adams βœ“ Verified
4 weeks ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exactly What I Needed
For the price, it works well enough so it’s acceptable.
NP
Nathan Phillips βœ“ Verified
1 month ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
superb for Turquoise Bangle
At first, the Turquoise Bangle works as described and I don’t regret it.
RH
Ryan Hill βœ“ Verified
2 weeks ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
magnificent Turquoise Bangle!
In daily use, the Turquoise Bangle is practical and I don’t regret it.
RH
Ryan Hill βœ“ Verified
2 months ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
appreciate this Turquoise Bangle!
The Turquoise Bangle was slightly smaller than I expected, but still usable.